What we collect!

 

Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Stamporama Discussion Board Logo
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps



What we collect!
What we collect!


General Philatelic/Identify This? : Dutch Indies Q. Wilhelmina Scott #'s 183-188 and #'s 218--225

 

Author
Postings
Kool

13 Nov 2023
07:46:30pm

Approvals
How to identify the two sets of large Wilhelmina stamps, each according to Scott to have perf 12 1/2 . For the 1938-1940 stamps, there is the addition of a 2g and 5g. But the colors according to Scott are the same for the other values. OR are the stamps the same for 1933-37 and 1938-40. For the smaller stamps the different perfs are easy to identify. Your thoughts, please.Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
DavidG
Members Picture


APS member since 2004

13 Nov 2023
08:30:30pm
re: Dutch Indies Q. Wilhelmina Scott #'s 183-188 and #'s 218--225

Check the watermarks. 1933 set is unwatermarked, the 1937 set is watermarked.

Cheers!


David
Ottawa, Canada

Like 
4 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

"President, The Society for Costa Rica Collectors"
Jerryderrstamps
Members Picture


13 Nov 2023
11:05:39pm
re: Dutch Indies Q. Wilhelmina Scott #'s 183-188 and #'s 218--225

One area that I think Scott could improve is their "it's this until it's something else" policy on things like printing type and watermarks.

For instance 164-88 are photogravure, but one has to go back to #163 to find that out.
And 200-225 are watermarked #202, but one has to go back to #196-9 to find that out.

They don't do the same thing with perforations, so why not with printing and watermarks as well.

I know they've done it that way for as long as I can remember, but it would make life a lot simpler (and reduce questions like this) if they showed that information with every set.

Like 
7 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

www.ebay.com/str/jerryderrstamps
Kool

14 Nov 2023
12:35:35pm

Approvals
re: Dutch Indies Q. Wilhelmina Scott #'s 183-188 and #'s 218--225

MANY many thanks. I knew there were experts out there to put me straight! I'll check watermarks and see which ones are right/wrong. Thanks again.


Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
        

 

Author/Postings
Kool

13 Nov 2023
07:46:30pm

Approvals

How to identify the two sets of large Wilhelmina stamps, each according to Scott to have perf 12 1/2 . For the 1938-1940 stamps, there is the addition of a 2g and 5g. But the colors according to Scott are the same for the other values. OR are the stamps the same for 1933-37 and 1938-40. For the smaller stamps the different perfs are easy to identify. Your thoughts, please.Image Not Found

Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Members Picture
DavidG

APS member since 2004
13 Nov 2023
08:30:30pm

re: Dutch Indies Q. Wilhelmina Scott #'s 183-188 and #'s 218--225

Check the watermarks. 1933 set is unwatermarked, the 1937 set is watermarked.

Cheers!


David
Ottawa, Canada

Like 
4 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

"President, The Society for Costa Rica Collectors"
Members Picture
Jerryderrstamps

13 Nov 2023
11:05:39pm

re: Dutch Indies Q. Wilhelmina Scott #'s 183-188 and #'s 218--225

One area that I think Scott could improve is their "it's this until it's something else" policy on things like printing type and watermarks.

For instance 164-88 are photogravure, but one has to go back to #163 to find that out.
And 200-225 are watermarked #202, but one has to go back to #196-9 to find that out.

They don't do the same thing with perforations, so why not with printing and watermarks as well.

I know they've done it that way for as long as I can remember, but it would make life a lot simpler (and reduce questions like this) if they showed that information with every set.

Like 
7 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.

www.ebay.com/str/jer ...
Kool

14 Nov 2023
12:35:35pm

Approvals

re: Dutch Indies Q. Wilhelmina Scott #'s 183-188 and #'s 218--225

MANY many thanks. I knew there were experts out there to put me straight! I'll check watermarks and see which ones are right/wrong. Thanks again.


Like 
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
        

Contact Webmaster | Visitors Online | Unsubscribe Emails | Facebook


User Agreement

Copyright © 2024 Stamporama.com