I think that issue was still tagged using a mat. I don't have the pane in front of me, so I can't verify.
If so, it looks like a tagging ghost -- which would make it a freak. Tagging ghosts are not that common on recent stamps (compared to stamps of the 1970s).
I agree. It's a tagging ghost.
Thank-you, folks.
I'll check the tagging and report back to you!
David
Folks:
Here is a pair of stamps on piece:
Here is a close-up of the date in the lower left corner:
It is the same on the stamp on the right. Is this unusual?
A minor freak?
Thoughts?
Thanks!
David Giles
Ottawa, Canada
re: Double Printing of 2002
I think that issue was still tagged using a mat. I don't have the pane in front of me, so I can't verify.
If so, it looks like a tagging ghost -- which would make it a freak. Tagging ghosts are not that common on recent stamps (compared to stamps of the 1970s).
re: Double Printing of 2002
I agree. It's a tagging ghost.
re: Double Printing of 2002
Thank-you, folks.
I'll check the tagging and report back to you!
David