Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Purchased this SG 103b KGV the other day, described as 103b. I am using a 2012 SG Commonwealth Catalogue of Australia (7th Edition) and it does not list 103b. There is a 103, and a 103a. But no b. Is the b listed in a newer catalogue?
There are plenty of 103a and 103b for sale on eBay, so it seems both exist. Just confused why the b isn't listed in my 2012 catalogue. And if anyone has any information as to what characteristics a "b" is known for would be helpful.
Thanks!
Eric
Login to Like
this post
Hi Eric
The Stanley Gibbons Catalogues of Australian Stamps never have complete varieties, and even though your stamp may not show up in a SG catalogue, it could well be listed in the Australian Commonwealth Specialists' Catalogue of King George V.
I will look at the ACSC and see what I can find about the 103B.
Rob
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
The 5d KGV 13½x12½ I believe comes in 2 different watermarks, a small multiple and C of A.
This may be what the a/b means according to the seller
Login to Like
this post
"The 5d KGV 13½x12½ I believe comes in 2 different watermarks, a small multiple C and of A. This may be what the a/b means"
The 5d KGV 13½x12½ with the small multiple watermark is SG 103a.
The 5d KGV 13½x12½ with the C of A watermark is SG 130.
There is no SG 103b in my 2013 SG Part 1.
Login to Like
this post
Eureka moment. I went back on eBay to make sure there were multiple listings of SG 103b, a statement I made above. While there were 7 listings, they were all by the same seller, someone by the name of Stampy.Stamps. So, perhaps StampyStamps is incorrect on his listing. I am dubious of the b at this point. Quite sure my stamp is 103a.
Thanks all for postings,
Cheers!
Eric
Login to Like
this post
And sure enough, the stamp I purchased was from Stampy.Stamps.
I messaged stampy.stamps and he posted back that it was a typo and should have been SG 103a.
And thus ends the mystery of SB 103b.
Eric
Login to Like
this post
Purchased this SG 103b KGV the other day, described as 103b. I am using a 2012 SG Commonwealth Catalogue of Australia (7th Edition) and it does not list 103b. There is a 103, and a 103a. But no b. Is the b listed in a newer catalogue?
There are plenty of 103a and 103b for sale on eBay, so it seems both exist. Just confused why the b isn't listed in my 2012 catalogue. And if anyone has any information as to what characteristics a "b" is known for would be helpful.
Thanks!
Eric
Login to Like
this post
re: Australia SG #103b Mystery
Hi Eric
The Stanley Gibbons Catalogues of Australian Stamps never have complete varieties, and even though your stamp may not show up in a SG catalogue, it could well be listed in the Australian Commonwealth Specialists' Catalogue of King George V.
I will look at the ACSC and see what I can find about the 103B.
Rob
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
04:28:35pm
re: Australia SG #103b Mystery
The 5d KGV 13½x12½ I believe comes in 2 different watermarks, a small multiple and C of A.
This may be what the a/b means according to the seller
Login to Like
this post
re: Australia SG #103b Mystery
"The 5d KGV 13½x12½ I believe comes in 2 different watermarks, a small multiple C and of A. This may be what the a/b means"
The 5d KGV 13½x12½ with the small multiple watermark is SG 103a.
The 5d KGV 13½x12½ with the C of A watermark is SG 130.
There is no SG 103b in my 2013 SG Part 1.
Login to Like
this post
re: Australia SG #103b Mystery
Eureka moment. I went back on eBay to make sure there were multiple listings of SG 103b, a statement I made above. While there were 7 listings, they were all by the same seller, someone by the name of Stampy.Stamps. So, perhaps StampyStamps is incorrect on his listing. I am dubious of the b at this point. Quite sure my stamp is 103a.
Thanks all for postings,
Cheers!
Eric
Login to Like
this post
re: Australia SG #103b Mystery
And sure enough, the stamp I purchased was from Stampy.Stamps.
I messaged stampy.stamps and he posted back that it was a typo and should have been SG 103a.
And thus ends the mystery of SB 103b.
Eric
Login to Like
this post