Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
2¢ George Washington, carmine
Perf. 12, Flat plate, LH, OG
nick upper left, top 1/3rd
watermark, hard to see, but it
"should" have one - let us go
with slw
stamp is 21+mm wide, but not
quite 21.5mm
all information or help is sincerely
appreciate
Respectfully submitted:
jrc531
Login to Like
this post
Hi! It seems to be a #386 if your watermark identification is correct. Hinged catalogs for $120 but the nick reduces that greatly. My guess is it's worth about $5. ccndd Chris
Login to Like
this post
If it is single line, then it might be a 386.
Warning Signs
1. The perfs are close to being aligned, a 'no-no' for a flat plate coil.
2. There appears to be some regumming at the top.
3. Centering appears to be very good, not typical for W/F coils
Good Things
1. Perf holes not perfectly aligned
2. Not a rare stamp so less likely to be faked
3. No obvious trimming
On balance and without having stamp in hand, I am leaning towards a legit 386 with faults and suspect gum
Don
Login to Like
this post
Compare it to a known genuine coil from the same era. If the imperf sides of this stamp are wider than the known example, then there is a good chance it is a fake of an imperf stamp. Coils cannot be "jumbo", because they were trimmed to fit in coil dispensers. Coils with too large margins would result in the stamps getting jammed in the dispensers.
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Thank you all for your time and information.
Respectfully submitted:
jrc531
Login to Like
this post
03:05:47pm
What I think I know?
2¢ George Washington, carmine
Perf. 12, Flat plate, LH, OG
nick upper left, top 1/3rd
watermark, hard to see, but it
"should" have one - let us go
with slw
stamp is 21+mm wide, but not
quite 21.5mm
all information or help is sincerely
appreciate
Respectfully submitted:
jrc531
Login to Like
this post
re: stamp identification or your thoughts
Hi! It seems to be a #386 if your watermark identification is correct. Hinged catalogs for $120 but the nick reduces that greatly. My guess is it's worth about $5. ccndd Chris
Login to Like
this post
re: stamp identification or your thoughts
If it is single line, then it might be a 386.
Warning Signs
1. The perfs are close to being aligned, a 'no-no' for a flat plate coil.
2. There appears to be some regumming at the top.
3. Centering appears to be very good, not typical for W/F coils
Good Things
1. Perf holes not perfectly aligned
2. Not a rare stamp so less likely to be faked
3. No obvious trimming
On balance and without having stamp in hand, I am leaning towards a legit 386 with faults and suspect gum
Don
Login to Like
this post
06:47:13pm
re: stamp identification or your thoughts
Compare it to a known genuine coil from the same era. If the imperf sides of this stamp are wider than the known example, then there is a good chance it is a fake of an imperf stamp. Coils cannot be "jumbo", because they were trimmed to fit in coil dispensers. Coils with too large margins would result in the stamps getting jammed in the dispensers.
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
04:19:07pm
re: stamp identification or your thoughts
Thank you all for your time and information.
Respectfully submitted:
jrc531
Login to Like
this post