Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
my album page has these roses at the bottom
what are the scott numbers for the missing stamps so i can add them to my want list?
is the current rose stamp in the right spot on that page?
thank you
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
Kira,
Eventually you'll become used to Scott particular way of listing stamps.
This stamp is Scott #3052 issued on 13/8/99.
Your album, commercial or home made is incomplete, this stamp was issued as a booklet so the perfs.
will vary, in this particular case it shows perfs. all around, left side imperf. and right side imperf.
There were three different booklets issued so there are several configurations to collect if you are so incline.
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
i am just trying to fill out this page and figuring out what the author wanted in these slots
i read the scott entry for 3052, also listed as A2351, many times trying to understand
i am still confused
in my want list, would it make sense to add these entries for the stamps needed to fill out my page:
3052 roses, perforated on 4 sides
3052 roses, perforated on 2 sides
also the last stamp entry says "2000 on base"
is that also the 3052 stamp if it is from the year 2000?
arrggg
Login to Like
this post
Hi Kira, there are really only two variations to collect unless you want to get all the imperf edges from the various booklet combinations.
The original Scott#3052 was perf 11.5x11.5 on 2, 3 or 4 sides (from booklets) issued in 1999.
3052E issued in 2000 (dated at bottom left) was perf 10.75x10.5 on 2 or 3 sides.
I only have the dated 2000 one, so am unable to show you the original, but presume it is either dated 1999 or undated.
So going to your page I see that the stamp you have is dated 1999, so this is 3052, the blank spaces either side are also 3052 but just variations with the imperf edges.
The last space is for the stamp dated 2000 (perf 10.75x10.5 on 2 or 3 sides) Scott #3052E.
Hope this helps.
Edit. if you use this search term for stamps on ebay it shows the various booklet panes and individual stamps from those panes. "usa 1999/2000 scott 3052 booklets"
Login to Like
this post
@Kira
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when you said "i read the scott entry for 3052, also listed as A2351, many times trying to understand", as such A2351 is the Scott Ills. number!
This number is useful, more useful on older stamps with the same design!
Again, if I'm wrong sorry.
Login to Like
this post
No, 3025 is a different stamp, a flower, but of different size and format.
Login to Like
this post
I don't see where anyone mentioned Scott #3025......??
Login to Like
this post
If you visit Colnect.com and search by US / Denomination then select the rose image, it will usually display all design variants. You can change tile view to see the details.
Scott numbers seem to match what Colnect calls Stamp Numbers.
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
"I don't see where anyone mentioned Scott #3025......??"
Read Kiras 2nd posting carefully.
Login to Like
this post
3025 was probably a typo.
Login to Like
this post
Upon reflection, I guess that as both types are year dated that solves the id, then only remains to decide whether to save all the various straight edge variations of each issue.
Login to Like
this post
yes, sorry for the typo
i fixed it in the previous message
is 3052E the version of the roses that are tagged with the year 2000?
Login to Like
this post
Yes Kira, the 2000 stamp is 3052E.
Login to Like
this post
Got it, Tony - I stand corrected.
Login to Like
this post
ok
i have set it up like this in my want list
thank you all for the clarifications
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
i started creating my usa want list based on the scott numbering system
my album page has these roses at the bottom
what are the scott numbers for the missing stamps so i can add them to my want list?
is the current rose stamp in the right spot on that page?
thank you
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
re: roses scott numbers?
Kira,
Eventually you'll become used to Scott particular way of listing stamps.
This stamp is Scott #3052 issued on 13/8/99.
Your album, commercial or home made is incomplete, this stamp was issued as a booklet so the perfs.
will vary, in this particular case it shows perfs. all around, left side imperf. and right side imperf.
There were three different booklets issued so there are several configurations to collect if you are so incline.
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.
re: roses scott numbers?
i am just trying to fill out this page and figuring out what the author wanted in these slots
i read the scott entry for 3052, also listed as A2351, many times trying to understand
i am still confused
in my want list, would it make sense to add these entries for the stamps needed to fill out my page:
3052 roses, perforated on 4 sides
3052 roses, perforated on 2 sides
also the last stamp entry says "2000 on base"
is that also the 3052 stamp if it is from the year 2000?
arrggg
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
Hi Kira, there are really only two variations to collect unless you want to get all the imperf edges from the various booklet combinations.
The original Scott#3052 was perf 11.5x11.5 on 2, 3 or 4 sides (from booklets) issued in 1999.
3052E issued in 2000 (dated at bottom left) was perf 10.75x10.5 on 2 or 3 sides.
I only have the dated 2000 one, so am unable to show you the original, but presume it is either dated 1999 or undated.
So going to your page I see that the stamp you have is dated 1999, so this is 3052, the blank spaces either side are also 3052 but just variations with the imperf edges.
The last space is for the stamp dated 2000 (perf 10.75x10.5 on 2 or 3 sides) Scott #3052E.
Hope this helps.
Edit. if you use this search term for stamps on ebay it shows the various booklet panes and individual stamps from those panes. "usa 1999/2000 scott 3052 booklets"
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
@Kira
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when you said "i read the scott entry for 3052, also listed as A2351, many times trying to understand", as such A2351 is the Scott Ills. number!
This number is useful, more useful on older stamps with the same design!
Again, if I'm wrong sorry.
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
No, 3025 is a different stamp, a flower, but of different size and format.
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
I don't see where anyone mentioned Scott #3025......??
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
If you visit Colnect.com and search by US / Denomination then select the rose image, it will usually display all design variants. You can change tile view to see the details.
Scott numbers seem to match what Colnect calls Stamp Numbers.
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
re: roses scott numbers?
"I don't see where anyone mentioned Scott #3025......??"
Read Kiras 2nd posting carefully.
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
3025 was probably a typo.
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
Upon reflection, I guess that as both types are year dated that solves the id, then only remains to decide whether to save all the various straight edge variations of each issue.
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
yes, sorry for the typo
i fixed it in the previous message
is 3052E the version of the roses that are tagged with the year 2000?
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
Yes Kira, the 2000 stamp is 3052E.
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
Got it, Tony - I stand corrected.
Login to Like
this post
re: roses scott numbers?
ok
i have set it up like this in my want list
thank you all for the clarifications
1 Member
likes this post.
Login to Like.