For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
Discussion - Member to Member Sales - Research Center
For People Who Love To Talk About Stamps
Home
Show Topics
Search
Last Day
Last Week
Last 30
Last 30 By Time
My Favs
Auction
Approvals
The Penny Page
New User Info
Overview
Formatting Msgs
Emoticons
General Philatelic/Identify This? : Fiji watermarks??
Author
Postings
Stamps # 315, 318, & 319, from the "Birds" set are shown as having 2 watermarks. i have carefully checked the 3 mentioned and cannot find any indication of a watermark (stamps are mint, clean, and no possible obstruction/interference), yet Scott's doesn't show these stamps otherwise - either watermark 314 or 373. Any thoughts??
Login to Like
this post
re: Fiji watermarks??
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
"'That's just it,' said the Hemulen in despair. 'It's finished. There isn't a stamp, or an error that I haven't collected. Not one. What shall I do now? ''Nature study!' declares the Hemulen. 'I shall botanize'. "
In my experience, the two watermarks are often very faint to undectable (by me at least) in much of British Commonwealth stamps of that era.
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.
Author/Postings
12:55:05pm
Auctions
Stamps # 315, 318, & 319, from the "Birds" set are shown as having 2 watermarks. i have carefully checked the 3 mentioned and cannot find any indication of a watermark (stamps are mint, clean, and no possible obstruction/interference), yet Scott's doesn't show these stamps otherwise - either watermark 314 or 373. Any thoughts??
Login to Like
this post
re: Fiji watermarks??
In my experience, the two watermarks are often very faint to undectable (by me at least) in much of British Commonwealth stamps of that era.
2 Members
like this post.
Login to Like.